Wednesday, February 18, 2015

Lockheed Martin hit by record 50 cyber attacks in 2014 - not the only ones

Cyber attacks embolden hackers - World - CBC News
Record number of cyber attacks hit Lockheed Martin in 2014 - Military Embedded Systems
ARLINGTON, VA. Lockheed Martin CEO Marillyn Hewson, announced that Lockheed Martin was hit by 50 cyber attacks during 2014, the most the company has ever seen directed against it and Hewson says she expects the number to only increase.
She made her remarks during an address to journalists at 's corporate media day in Arlington, Va. During a break out session, myself and a few other journalists met with the company's cyber leadership who said the number of 50 attacks was up significantly from 28 in 2010 when there only 10 attacks.

Investigation reveals cyberattacks on defense contractors - The Washington Post
Defense contractors recently suffered a barrage of cyberattacks from the Chinese government, according to a Senate investigation released Wednesday that revealed startling vulnerabilities in how the Pentagon transports troops and equipment.
Contractors working for the U.S. Transportation Command were successfully hacked about 50 times over a 12-month span that ended in May 2013. Of those, at least 20 were sophisticated intrusions attributed to China, the investigation found.
Despite the seriousness of the breaches, the Transportation Command was made aware of only two, even though other government agencies such as the FBI knew about the intrusions.

US Defense Contractors Still Vulnerable to Cyber Attacks - ThreatTrack Security

It is clear the Edward Snowden affair has had a profound impact on U.S. defense contractors, especially among smaller companies, forcing them to re-evaluate policies and get more stringent with hiring and data access privileges. Nevertheless, contractors believe government guidance on security practices is adequate, though they still feel vulnerable to cybercrime.

It's unlikely that vulnerability can ever be eradicated, considering the frequency of attacks involving malware that grows more complex and elusive by the day. But there are some concrete steps contractors should take to mitigate security risks: implement dynamic malware analysis tools and advanced threat defenses; strengthen their ranks of highly skilled cybersecurity professionals; further review data-access privileges; and reduce risky employee behavior - including senior leadership - such as opening phishing emails, visiting high-risk websites and attaching infected devices to PCs.

Chips are in the cards for US

What Is a Chip-and-PIN Credit Card? - EMV Cards
US EMV Adoption to Drive Market | EE Times
The next time US cardholders receive a new card it will probably be equipped with an EMV chip, and most likely be contactless. The US is finally making the transition to secure cards based on the European EMV standard, mostly because the liability shift imposed by the three big credit card brands -- Visa, MasterCard and American Express -- will start on October. If the merchant is EMV compliant and has a POS system equipped to read EMV cards, and the card is not, because the financial institution has not started issuing them yet -- effectively forcing the merchant to run your card on the magnetic stripe reader -- then the bank or credit card issuer has to pay for the misuse of the card. Conversely if the issuer has upgraded to EMV by sending chip cards to its card holders, but the merchant has not upgraded their point of sale to accept them, the retailer bears the cost for counterfeit fraud.

US Warms Up To EMV Credit Cards | Bankrate.com

US to allow FMS sales to allied countries of some armed military UAVs

Obama administration to allow allied countries to buy military drones - LA Times

Obama administration to allow sales of armed drones to allies - The Washington Post
US to Allow Export of Armed Military Drones | Military.com

Obama administration unveiled a new policy Tuesday allowing foreign allies to buy military drones, a move that could have potentially far-reaching implications for global security partnerships and the U.S. aerospace industry.

For years, American drone makers have been eager to feed the international appetite for the high-tech unmanned aircraft that have reshaped modern warfare, but U.S. export regulations have prevented them from doing so.


The change of policy could result in a windfall for the aerospace industry in Southern California, where much of drone manufacturing is centered. In its latest assessment of the industry, aerospace research firm Teal Group Corp. estimated that drone spending would almost double to $11.5 billion in 2024.

Northrop Grumman Corp. and Lockheed Martin Corp. assemble drones in Palmdale. In Poway in San Diego County, General Atomics Aeronautical Systems Inc. builds the armed Predator and Reaper drones that have become the centerpiece of U.S. counterterrorism missions.


U.S. Export Policy for Military Unmanned Aerial Systems

Enhanced Controls on the Export of U.S.-Origin Military UASs


The United States is committed to stringent standards for the sale, transfer, and subsequent use of U.S.-origin military UAS. The United States’ new UAS export policy establishes the standards by which the United States will assess, on a case-by-case basis under the U.S. Conventional Arms Transfer Policy, potential exports of military UASs, including armed systems. The new export policy puts in place stringent conditions on the sale or transfer of military UAS, including potential
requirements for:
  • Sales and transfers of sensitive systems to be made through the government-to-government Foreign Military Sales program;
  • Review of potential transfers to be made through the Department of  Defense Technology Security and Foreign Disclosure processes;
  • Each recipient nation to be required to agree to end-use assurances as a condition of sale or transfer;
  • End-use monitoring and potential additional security conditions to be required; and
  • All sales and transfers to include agreement to principles for proper use.
MCTR Regime Countries
The new policy also maintains the United States’ long-standing commitments under the Missile Technology Control Regime (MTCR), which subjects transfers of military and commercial systems that cross the threshold of MTCR Category I (i.e., UAS that are capable of a range of  at least 300 kilometers and are capable of carrying a payload of at  least 500 kilograms) to a “strong presumption of denial” for export but also permits such exports on “rare occasions” that are well justified in terms of the nonproliferation and export control factors specified in the MTCR Guidelines.


US Authorizes Sale of Armed Drones | The Diplomat

A June 2014 report by the Stimson Center’s Drone Task Force, noted on this subject that, “The U.S. government should also inquire into the broader non-proliferation effect of the MTCR Category I presumption of denial. The U.S. government should determine whether, in the long run, the presumption remains a useful non-proliferation tool or inadvertently fosters the growth of foreign UAV manufacturing capability by suppressing the participation of U.S. industry in the global MTCR
Category I UAV market.” However, no further details on the exact policy governing the sales of Category I drones have been made publicly available as of now.


Today, a State Department official merely provided a broad rationale behind the loosening of  restrictions to Reuters: ”The new policy ensures appropriate participation for U.S. industry in the
emerging commercial UAS [unmanned aerial systems] market, which will contribute to the health of the U.S. industrial base, and thus to U.S.  national security, which includes economic security. As with any other sale, all UAS sales will continue to be reviewed for human rights,  regional power balance, and other implications.

DOT Volpe Center continues JHU/APL for ADS-B & TCAS support

Support Services for Automatic Dependent Surveillance – Broadcast (ADS-B) and Traffic Alert and Collision Avoidance System (TCAS) programs. - DTRT5714Q80075 - Federal Business Opportunities: Opportunities

The United States Department of Transportation (DOT), Research and Innovative Technology Administration (RITA), John A. Volpe National Transportation Systems Center (Volpe Center), located in Cambridge, MA, under the statutory authority of 41 U.S.C. 253(c)(3), and FAR Part 6, paragraph 6.302-3{a)(2)(ii), intends to award a contract on a non-competitive basis to The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory (JHU/APL).

ADS-B supports NEXTGEN
TCAS enhances Flight Safety
The objective of this procurement is to acquire the essential services of JHU/APL to provide support to the Volpe Center's efforts on the Automatic Dependent Surveillance - Broadcast (ADS-B) and  Traffic Alert and Collision Avoidance System (TCAS) programs. The Government's minimum need is twofold:

  1. to continue with in-service management, Air Traffic Control (ATC) and cockpit applications and programmatic  (common) support in the implementation of ADS-B and broadcast services
    as the replacement for current secondary radar in the National Airspace  System (NAS) that supports the Federal Aviation Administration's (FAA) Surveillance and Broadcast Services (SBS) Program Office; and
  2. advance the TCAS as the primary, flight deck-based, anti-collision system.

Background

Cyber Operations Aviation Safety

For more than a decade, APL has supported the development of Automatic Dependent Surveillance-Broadcast (ADS-B), the next-generation airborne surveillance and cockpit avionics technology. APL participated in development of the system specifications, performed modeling and analysis of Air Traffic Control safe separation between aircraft with ADS-B, validated ADS-B system requirements, developed requirements for legacy FAA automation systems integration with ADS-B, served on
international standards committees, and created the performance monitor for the national ADS-B system. As a result, APL is part of a 26-organization team that received the 2007 Collier Trophy, awarded annually by the National Aeronautic Association “for the greatest achievement in aeronautics or astronautics in America, with respect to improving the performance, efficiency, and safety of air or space vehicles, the value of which has been thoroughly demonstrated by actual
use during the preceding year."


WP21-04-Analysis_of_1090ES_GBT_Performance_in_LA_2020_Terminal_Environment.pdf

Air Force Considers Stealthy A-10 CAS Replacement - not F-35?


Air Force Magazine - Stealthy Son of A-10?

​The Air Force will consider developing a new dedicated close air support platform capable of operating in contested airspace; a follow-on to the A-10, Air Combat Command chief Gen. Hawk Carlisle said Thursday. Speaking with reporters at AFA’s Air Warfare Symposium in Orlando, Carlisle said that such a platform “may be something … we need to look at in the future, depending on what’s happening. Nothing is off the table.” Carlisle said he believes “we’ll have to perform close air support in contested environments” given that adversaries are growing more sophisticated. They “are going to try to figure out how to … not let us do that,” he said, so a new platform may be required. The idea is not a response to critics of USAF’s plan to retire the A-10, Carlisle insisted. USAF has “always been dedicated to the mission of support to the ground component” and takes the mission seriously, he maintained. Airspace denial is already a tough challenge, and the need to “close … gaps and seams” in future capability “I think (is) something we have to be cognizant of.” He added that for the near-term, “there may be something that we can do with legacy platforms to make them better” at delivering CAS. The A-10 is “significantly more vulnerable in a contested environment than other airplanes … and what provides that mission set in the future is something we’ll continue to look at … it’s something that’s got to be in the discussion,” he added.


A-10: Close Air Support Wonder Weapon Or Boneyard Bound? « Breaking Defense - Defense industry news, analysis and commentary

ACC Head: Follow-On to A-10 Aircraft Possible
Next month, the service will host representatives from the other services in a weeklong summit on the close air support mission, in order to figure out a way forward.
"We're bringing Army, Air Force, Marines, Navy folks together at the 06 level and down to do these working groups," Carlisle said. The real purpose is [to figure out] where we've been, what we've learned."
"I think everything is getting wrapped around the A-10," he added. "Ultimately, we are committed to that mission we have always been committed and we always will be, and it's to try and get back to the focus on the mission area."

General: ‘We Don’t Have a Replacement’ for A-10, U-2 | Defense Tech

The Air Force’s Awesome Attack Plane Has a Pretty Sad Replacement — War Is Boring — Medium
But the JSF just can’t do the job. Besides having a terrible view of the battlefield, the F-35 is also too fast and lightly built to loiter over a hot ambush zone — and its 25-millimeter gun comes with just 180 rounds, compared to the more than 1,100 bullets an A-10 carries. It’s worth pointing out that the two Warthogs over the Afghan battle apparently fired all their ammunition.
“Note the actions the F-35 is incapable to perform,” said Winslow Wheeler, director of the Straus Military Reform Project at the Project on Government Oversight in Washington, D.C. “Among them long time loiter, low altitude observation of the problem, multiple gun passes with extreme accuracy.”
These things saved American lives. The A-10’s replacement? Perhaps not.

Monday, February 16, 2015

Russian-Ukrainian Kosmotras Dnepr to Launch S. Korean Satellite

The launch vehicle is steam ejected from its Transport and
Launch Canister (TLC) by means of hot gases of
black powder gas generator. Dnepr liftoff sequence is shown
Russian-Ukrainian Satan Rocket to Launch S. Korean Satellite as Planned / Sputnik International
The joint Russian-Ukrainian company Kosmotras will go ahead with the launches of commercial and scientific satellites and spacecraft it had planned for 2015 using the Dnepr-1 rocket, including a South Korean Kompsat remote sensing satellite in mid-March.
KOMPSAT-5 - Satellite Missions
On the first Dnepr launch on 22 August 2013
The March 12 launch of the Dnepr-1 carrying a South Korean satellite will go ahead as planned, a source close to the space industry told Russia's RIA Novosti on Monday.
It had earlier been reported that the launch of the Dnepr-1 by Kosmotras, a Moscow-based joint Russian-Ukrainian company, had been suspended indefinitely. A Roscosmos representative had told RIA Novosti at the beginning of this month that the program had been frozen, its future potential to be determined in the near future.

Read more: http://sputniknews.com/russia/20150216/1018349289.html#ixzz3Rxo8OfC9

Currently AGI Provides Space Database - crypto could shield private data while sharing collision data

AGI Satellite Tracking « Google Earth Library
Cryptography to prevent satellite collisions - Space News - redOrbit
Cryptographers Could Prevent Satellite Collisions - Scientific American
“In the current working solution, the world’s four largest satellite communications providers have teamed up with a trusted third party: Analytical Graphics. The company aggregates their orbital data and alerts participants when satellites are at risk,” wrote Hemenway and Welser, adding that the arrangement “requires that all participants maintain mutual trust of the third party.”
Analytical Graphics, also known as AGI, makes commercial modeling and analysis software for the aerospace, defense, and intelligence communities. The company was founded in 1989 and is headquartered in Exton, Pennsylvania, though it also has offices located in Colorado, California, Washington DC, the UK, and Singapore. Its current CEO is Paul Graziani.
Satellite Database for PC - Analytical Graphics, Inc. (AGI)

Secure multi-party computation | The MPC Lounge
As more and more satellites are launched into orbit, and new companies and countries start to launch probes of their own, experts are looking for an easier way to keep track of the locations of different satellites. The belief, Hemenway and Welser said, is that adopting cryptography would eliminate the need for a mutually trusted third party altogether.
“In the 1980s, specialists developed algorithms that allowed many people to jointly compute a function on private data without revealing any number of secrets,” they wrote. “In 2010 DARPA tasked teams of cryptographers to apply this technology to develop so-called secure multiparty computation (MPC) protocols for satellite data sharing.”
“In this method, each participant loads proprietary data into its own software, which then sends messages back and forth according to a publicly specified MPC protocol,” the duo added. “The design of the protocol guarantees that participants can compute a desired output (for example, the probability of collision) but nothing else. And because the protocol design is public, anyone involved can write their own software client,” eliminating the need for mutual trust.
Such a plan is not without drawbacks, however, and foremost among them is speed. The calculations needed to determine the odds of collisions between two orbiting satellite would require intense data crunching that could take 90 seconds when performed on commodity hardware, Welser and Hemenway explained.

Read more at http://www.redorbit.com/news/space/1113334629/cryptography-to-prevent-satellite-collisions-021615/#EkoMLWU1KdgJ1TiF.99
 Ramifications of DARPA's Programming Computation on Encrypted Data Program | RAND

Programming Computation on Encrypted Data (PROCEED) is a Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency program whose primary purpose is to improve the efficiency of algorithms that allow people to carry out computations on encrypted data — without having to decrypt the data itself. RAND was asked to evaluate whether PROCEED — which expands the knowledge base of the global cryptographic community — is likely to provide more benefits to the United States than it does to its global rivals. The research team's assessment focused on the degree to which PROCEED technologies may be adopted, under what circumstances, and for what purpose. The team then used the analytic framework generated to understand technological uptake decisions as a way of ascertaining how such factors would work in Russia and China vis-à-vis the United States (and, by extension, countries similar to the United States).
Analysis of online searches for information about data encryption, information security, and data protection in Russia and China concluded that, given government approval of PROCEED technologies, their diffusion will be more rapid in China than in Russia. Whether PROCEED technologies will be adopted in the face of the processing penalties that will be associated with using them is difficult to determine at this time. If PROCEED is adopted, it is likely to be adopted more rapidly in the United States (and similar developed countries) than it is in Russia and China, in large part because PROCEED is compatible with the U.S. political culture, and in smaller part because it better accords to the U.S. business environment.
Satellite Anomalies: Benefits of a Centralized Anomaly Database and Methods for Securely Sharing Information Among Satellite Operators | RAND
Satellite anomalies are mission-degrading events that negatively affect on-orbit operational spacecraft. All satellites experience anomalies of some kind during their operational lifetime. They range in severity from temporary errors in noncritical subsystems to loss-of-contact and complete mission failure. There is a range of causes for these anomalies, and investigations by the satellite operator or manufacturer to determine the cause of a specific anomaly are sometimes conducted at significant expense.
Maintaining an anomaly database is one way to build an empirical understanding of what situations are more or less likely to result in satellite anomalies, and help determine causal relationships. These databases can inform future design and orbital regimes, and can help determine measures to prolong the useful life of an on-orbit spacecraft experiencing problems. However, there is no centralized, up-to-date, detailed, and broadly available database of anomalies covering many different satellites.
This report describes the nature and causes of satellite anomalies, and the potential benefits of a shared and centralized satellite anomaly database. Findings indicate that a shared satellite anomaly database would bring significant benefits to the commercial community, and the main obstacles are reluctance to share detailed information with the broader community, as well as a lack of dedicated resources available to any trusted third party to build and manage such a database. Trusted third parties and cryptographic methods such as secure multiparty computing or differential privacy are not complete solutions, but show potential to be further tailored to help resolve the issue of securely sharing anomaly data.

FAA finally drafts rules - Air Rights against UAVs?

NoFlyZone.org Offers Homeowners Privacy From UAVs | Aero-News Network
Even if you're not a celebrity dodging the paparazzi or a backcountry survivalist, you may not want someone with a quadcopter checking out what you're doing in your back yard. A new company called NoFlyZone.org has come up with a way for homeowners a way to establish a "no-fly zone" over property, "preserving and protecting residents' privacy from drones," according to a company news release. The company provides a comprehensive global database of no-drone areas, supported by drone manufacturers and operators who have joined the NoFlyZone community.
NoFlyZone will soon offer people the ability to set customized airspace access preferences. For example, individuals will be able to clarify that they may not want camera drones over their property, but they do want to receive packages delivered by drone. Some of these advanced features will be premium services, but those who register in February will receive a limited time offer of two years of all NoFlyZone services free of charge.

RPA-free airspace coming soon above your home — General Aviation News



Press Release – DOT and FAA Propose New Rules for Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems
WASHINGTON – The Department of Transportation’s Federal Aviation Administration today proposed a framework of regulations that would allow routine use of certain small unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) in today’s aviation system, while maintaining flexibility to accommodate future technological innovations.
The FAA proposal offers safety rules for small UAS (under 55 pounds) conducting non-recreational operations. The rule would limit flights to daylight and visual-line-of-sight operations. It also addresses height restrictions, operator certification, optional use of a visual observer, aircraft registration and marking, and operational limits.




No FLY Zones | DJI

NoFlyZone aims to keep the airspace over your home drone-free | Naked Security
Just what, exactly, is a privacy-conscious person to do about unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) beating their nosy little rotors over an individual's private airspace?
Well, there's the upcoming Rapere drone, a sort of cannibal anti-drone drone that the manufacturer says will hover over a target drone and lower webbing to snare its rotor blades: a prospect that sounds satisfyingly crunchy.
And there’s always shooting them down, which gives you the satisfaction of potentially jumping up and down on them and cursing melodramatically.
But both of these could mean the drones fall and hurt somebody. On top of all that, it's probably illegal. So don't do it.
Do not despair, and do not begin training your attack falcon. There's still one more hope for the drone-phobic.
It's called the NoFlyZone: a service that lets users input their addresses with the aim of keeping the airspace above their homes drone-free.

Angie's List Housecleaners



  • Kristina and Jareds Cleaning and Handyman Service
    Contact Information
    Kristina Mae Carlstedt
    2464 Fenton PkwyApt. 303
    San Diego CA 92108 (Map it)
    (775) 527-5440
  • Eme House Cleaning Service
    Emerita Rivas
    607 Avilar Ct
    San Marcos CA 92078 (Map it)
    (760) 419-7424
    (760) 803-9221
  • Pam's Cleaning Services
    Pam Randall
    PO Box 20
    La Mesa CA 91944
    (619) 822-8950
  • Merry Maids of Escondido
    Office Manager
    934 S Andreasen Dr Ste J
    Escondido CA 92029 (Map it)
    (855) 954-0161
    (760) 735-9068
    (760) 745-6370 (fax)
    www.merrymaids.com
  • Anny's Cleaning
    Alfredo Moreno
    336 Euclid AveSte 503
    San Diego CA 92114
    (619) 581-7236
  • TNT Cleaning Service
    Tamara L Tasota
    770 Harbor Cliff Way
    Oceanside CA 92054
    (724) 816-3067
  • Torres Housekeeping
    Simeona Torres
    1908 San Diego Ave
    San Diego CA 92110
    (619) 381-6566
    (619) 291-2383 (fax)
  • Loya's Cleaning Services
    Félix Angelica Loya
    P.O.Box 513
    Lemon Grove CA 91946
    (619) 399-2642
    (619) 930-0975
    www.loyascleaning.com

AFRL picks 6 bio-med firms for $20M Human Performance Wing services contract

Defense.gov Contracts for Friday, February 13, 2015
  1. Decypher, San Antonio, Texas (FA8650-15-D-4052); 
  2. Peerless Technologies Corp., Fairborn, Ohio (FA8650-15-D-4051);
  3. P3S, San Antonio, Texas (FA8650-15-D-4053);
  4. Prairie Quest Consulting, Fort Wayne, Indiana (FA8650-15-D-4054);
  5. Solutions Through Innovative Technologies Inc., Dayton, Ohio (FA8650-15-D-4055);
  6. SpecPro Technical Services, San Antonio, Texas (FA8650-15-D-4056), 
have been awarded a combined $20,000,000 indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity, firm-fixed-price
contract for services to units of the 711th Human Performance Wing. Contractor will provide advisory and assistance services, non- advisory and assistance services and personal services. They include

  • administrative and functional support, 
  • medical and biomedical research assistance, 
  • clinical and clinical hyperbaric medicine services, 
  • environmental bio-terrorism support, 
  • technology evaluation and research studies support. 
Work will be performed at 
  • Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio; 
  • San Antonio, Texas; 
  • Cincinnati, Ohio; 
  • Baltimore, Maryland; 
  • St. Louis, Missouri, and 
  • other geographically separated units 
and is expected to be complete no later than Dec. 13, 2015. This award is the result of a limited competitive acquisition with six offers received. Fiscal year 2015 and 2016 defense health program, operations and maintenance and research, development, test and evaluation funds in the total amount of $800,309 are being obligated at the time of award. Each company is receiving different amounts. Air Force Research Laboratory, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio, is the contracting activity.

Sunday, February 15, 2015

Where are the high tech jobs in the US? Depends who and how you ask.

Brookings: Meet the country’s top advanced industry hotspots
Last week we released new research defining the U.S. “advanced industries” sector and showing how heavily the future prosperity of U.S. regions and the nation depends on this list of 50 R&D- and STEM-worker intensive industries. These industries—which range from automotive and aerospace manufacturing to energy activities to digital services like computer system design and software—play an outsized role in powering regional and national economic success. Their vitality and expansion are a prerequisite for any future inclusive growth.
And yet, only a limited number of U.S. metro areas retain truly dense and diverse advanced industry bases, however. The table shows the 20 large metro areas where advanced industries employ the biggest share of the workforce.



2014 Milken Institute Best-Performing Cities
The 2014 Milken Institute Best-Performing Cities Index ranks U.S. metropolitan areas by how well they are creating and sustaining jobs and economic growth. The components include job, wage and salary, and technology growth. In most years, these give a good indication of the underlying structural performance of regional economics.

The Surprising Cities Creating The Most Tech Jobs - Forbes
We turned to Mark Schill, research director at Praxis Strategy Group, to analyze job creation trends in the nation’s 52 largest metropolitan areas from 2001 to 2013, a period that extends from the bust of the last tech expansion to the flowering of the current one. He looked at employment in the industries we normally associate with technology, such as software, engineering and computer programming services. He also analyzed the numbers of workers in other industries who are classified as being in STEM occupations (science, technology, engineering and mathematics-related jobs). This captures the many tech workers who are employed in businesses that at first glance may not seem to have anything to do with technology at all. For instance just 8% of the nation’s 620,000 software application developers work at software firms — the vast majority are employed in industries as disparate as manufacturing, finance, and business services.
The four metro areas that have generated tech jobs at the fastest pace over the past 12 years are far outside the Bay Area, in the southern half of the country, in places with lower costs of living and generally friendly business climates.
  1. Austin-Round Rock-San Marcos, Texas, In first place: where tech companies have expanded employment by 41% since 2001 and the number of STEM workers has risen by 17% over the same period. Looking at the near-term, 2010-13, the Austin metro area also ranks first in the nation.
  2. Raleigh-Cary, N.C., which ranks second on our list. Like Austin, Raleigh-Cary is a big college metro area, and also hosts the state capital, something that tends to lessen wild swings during industry downturns. Like Austin, Raleigh is not a primary center of the social media boom, but it has registered a 54.7% increase in tech sector employment since 2001 and an impressive 24.6% rise in STEM jobs. 
  3. Houston-Sugarland-Baytown, Texas, and 
  4. Nashville-Franklin-Murfreesboro, Tenn.
Best Cities for Tech Jobs - BusinessWeek
Tech geeks, take note: Silicon Valley is still the center of the technology universe, but if you're thinking about a career in computing and want to avoid the Bay Area's sky-high cost of living, consider another locale—say, Durham, N.C., or even Huntsville, Ala.

Flip through this slide show for a glimpse of the 30 cities boasting the most high-tech jobs per capita. The American Electronics Assn., a trade group, compiled statistics on 60 cities using Labor Dept. data from 2006, the most recent period for which it's available. The slides rank cities by tech job density and include data on total jobs, growth in that total from 2005, average annual IT salary, ranking by salary, and biggest sector in each city.

Saturday, February 14, 2015

iPads Serve Pilot as Navigator of last resort

Pilot, wife use iPads to safely crash-land without landing gear
iPad-Turned-Navigation Device Guides Airplane To Gear-Up Landing | Aero-News Network
A pilot and his wife on a night flight between Wyoming and Wisconsin in a 1959 PA-24-250 Comanche were forced to turn to their iPads for primary navigation after a complete electrical system failure on the airplane late last Saturday.
ForeFlight includes just about everything a VFR or IFR
pilot needs, from moving maps to weight and balance features
Top 10 aviation apps - iPad Pilot News

The pilot, who was not identified, and his wife flew some 80 miles at night until reaching Rapid City Regional Airport in South Dakota using only altitude, airspeed, and heading information from the devices. But because of the electrical failure, they were unable to notify the airport they were arriving ... or extend the landing gear.
Rapid City Firefighter and Aircraft Rescue specialist Jerry Lueras told Fox News that the two used the the tablets to identify a runway that was not often used at the airport, and made a gear-up landing. Both walked away with no injuries.

Speckle noise Problem in Coherent Images - Probablistic Despeckling

The Nature of Speckle Noise

Speckle noise - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Speckle is a granular 'noise' that inherently exists in and degrades the quality of the active radar, synthetic aperture radar (SAR), and medical ultrasound images.
The vast majority of surfaces, synthetic or natural, are extremely rough on the scale of the wavelength. Images obtained from these surfaces by coherent imaging systems such as laser, SAR, and ultrasound suffer from a common phenomena called speckle. Speckle, in both cases, is primarily due to the interference of the returning wave at the transducer aperture. The origin of this noise is seen if we model our reflectivity function as an array of scatterers. Because of the finite resolution, at any time we are receiving from a distribution of scatterers within the resolution cell. These scattered signals add coherently; that is, they add constructively and destructively depending on the relative phases of each scattered waveform. Speckle noise results from these patterns of constructive and destructive interference shown as bright and dark dots in the image [1]

Speckle noise in SAR is generally serious, causing difficulties for image interpretation.[2][3] It is caused by coherent processing of backscattered signals from multiple distributed targets. In SAR oceanography, for example, speckle noise is caused by signals from elementary scatterers, the gravity-capillary ripples, and manifests as a pedestal image, beneath the image of the sea waves.[4][5]
The speckle can also represent some useful information, particularly when it is linked to the laser speckle and to the dynamic speckle phenomenon, where the changes of the speckle pattern, in time, can be a measurement of the surface's activity.

Speckle Noise Reduction

Several different methods are used to eliminate speckle noise, based upon different mathematical models of the phenomenon.[4] One method, for example, employs multiple-look processing (a.k.a. multi-look processing), averaging out the speckle noise by taking several "looks" at a target in a single radar sweep.[2][3] The average is the incoherent average of the looks.[3]
A second method involves using adaptive and non-adaptive filters on the signal processing (where adaptive filters adapt their weightings across the image to the speckle level, and non-adaptive filters apply the same weightings uniformly across the entire image). Such filtering also eliminates actual image information as well, in particular high-frequency information, and the applicability of filtering and the choice of filter type involves tradeoffs. Adaptive speckle filtering is better at preserving edges and detail in high-texture areas (such as forests or urban areas). Non-adaptive filtering is simpler to implement, and requires less computational power, however.[2][3]

Improving Titan SAR Images with Probabilistic Despeckle

Radar view of Ligeia Mare, a large hydrocarbon sea on Titan.
The original version is on the left and the enhanced,
“despeckled” version is on the right.
Image Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech/ASI

New Technique Provides Better, Clearer Radar Images of Titan’s Amazing Surface « AmericaSpace
Saturn’s largest moon Titan is a fascinating world, uniquely alien yet eerily Earth-like in many ways, with its rain, rivers, lakes, seas, and massive sand dunes. But in this extremely cold environment, it is liquid methane and ethane which act as “water,” mimicking the hydrological cycle on Earth. Also, due to the perpetual and global hazy cloud cover, the only way to see these features from orbit is by using radar, which is what the Cassini spacecraft has done on a regular basis for quite a few years now. As good as they are, though, the radar images contain electronic [speckle] noise, which reduces sharpness and clarity. But now a new technique is letting planetary scientists see Titan’s surface more clearly than ever before.
The technique is referred to as “despeckling” and produces cleaner images than the original radar images from the Cassini Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) instrument on Cassini. It uses an algorithm to modify the noise in the images, making it easier to see small-scale features or changes in the landscape. The idea was initiated by Antoine Lucas while he was working with members of the Cassini imaging team. He was a postdoctoral researcher at the California Institute of Technology in Pasadena at the time.
A New Way to View Titan: 'Despeckle' It | NASA
New imaging technique reveals Titan in unprecedented detail | Astronomy Now
Despeckling Cassini’s radar images has a variety of scientific benefits. Lucas and colleagues have shown that they can produce 3-D maps, called digital elevation maps, of Titan’s surface with greatly improved quality. With clearer views of river channels, lake shorelines and windswept dunes, researchers are also able to perform more precise analyses of processes shaping Titan’s surface. And Lucas suspects that the speckle noise itself, when analysed separately, may hold information about properties of the surface and subsurface. 

A despeckle filter for the Cassini synthetic aperture radar images of Titan's surface BRATSOLIS_PSS_2012.pdf
Cassini synthetic aperture radar (SAR) images of Titan, the largest satellite of Saturn, reveal surface features with shapes ranging from quasi-circular to more complex ones, interpreted as liquid hydrocarbon deposits assembled in the form of lakes or seas. One of the major problems hampering the derivation of meaningful texture information from SAR imagery is the speckle noise. It overlays real structures and causes gray value variations even in homogeneous parts of the image. We propose a filtering technique which can be applied to obtain restored SAR images. Our technique is based on probabilistic methods and regards an image as a random element drawn from a prespecified set of possible images. The despeckle filter can be used as an intermediate step for the extraction of regions of interest, corresponding to structured units in a given area or distinct objects of interest, such as lake-like features on Titan. This tool can therefore be used, among other, to study seasonal surficial changes of Titan’s polar regions. In this study we also present a segmentation technique that allows us to separate the lakes from the local background.

Other Recent work on Probabilistic Despeckle 

Abstract

A method for synthetic aperture radar (SAR) image despeckling based on a probabilistic generative model in nonsubsampled contourlet transform (NSCT) domain was proposed. The shrinkage estimator in NSCT domain consists of a new type of likelihood ratio and prior ratio, both of which are dependent on the estimated masks for the NSCT coefficients. While the previous probabilistic approaches are restricted to parametric models, the limitation is eliminated and the hybrid density model is applied in this paper. The suggested approach does not make heavy assumptions on the NSCT coefficient distribution, so that it can handle complex NSCT coefficient structures. The likelihood ratio is composed of the hybrid density, and the prior ratio is equipped with the selective neighborhood systems to enhance the detail information. The method can effectively adapt the shrinkage estimator to the redundancy property of the NSCT. The proposed approach was applied to real SAR images despeckling and compared through the SAR image vision effect, the equivalent number of looks, and the edge sustain index. Experimental results show that the proposed approach outperforms previous works involved in the paper with the better despeckling result and edge preservation.
Walessa, M.; Datcu, M., "Model-based despeckling and information extraction from SAR images," Geoscience and Remote Sensing, IEEE Transactions on , vol.38, no.5, pp.2258,2269, Sep 2000
doi: 10.1109/36.868883
Abstract: Basic textures as they appear, especially in high resolution SAR images, are affected by multiplicative speckle noise and should be preserved by despeckling algorithms. Sharp edges between different regions and strong scatterers also must be preserved. To despeckle images, the authors use a maximum aposteriori (MAP) estimation of the cross section, choosing between different prior models. The proposed approach uses a Gauss Markov random field (GMRF) model for textured areas and allows an adaptive neighborhood system for edge preservation between uniform areas. In order to obtain the best possible texture reconstruction, an expectation maximization algorithm is used to estimate the texture parameters that provide the highest evidence. Borders between homogeneous areas are detected with a stochastic region-growing algorithm, locally determining the neighborhood system of the Gauss Markov prior. Smoothed strong scatterers are found in the ratio image of the data and the filtering result and are replaced in the image. In this way, texture, edges between homogeneous regions, and strong scatterers are well reconstructed and preserved. Additionally, the estimated model parameters can be used for further image interpretation methods
URL: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=868883&isnumber=18811 

Previously

 spendergast: Cassini SAR Radar tracks Evolution of Mysterious Feature in Titan Sea

Friday, February 13, 2015

GA-ASI, FAA, and NASA team to develop and test UAV Sense and Avoid

NASA is using the remotely piloted Ikhana in the UAS-NAS project,
one of the nation’s most important research efforts for improving
safety and reducing technical barriers and operational challenges
associated with flying unmanned aircraft in airspace shared
by commercial and civil air traffic. Image Credit: 
NASA / Carla Thomas
GA-ASI VAlidates Airborne Sense & Avoid Radar Functionality Aboard Predator B


Due Regard Radar tested onboard Predator B aircraft by General Atomics - Military Embedded Systems

Throughout December, multiple flight tests occurred at the GA-ASI Gray Butte Flight Operations Facility and Edwards Air Force Base in Palmdale, Calif. Predator B was then flown in scripted encounters against multiple small- and medium-sized manned aircraft while the pre-production DRR simultaneously tracked multiple targets and then continued to search a wide Field-of-Regard (FoR).


GA-ASI’s Due Regard capability, which has the pre-production DRR and other components, is now at Technology Readiness Level (TRL) 7 and is ready for a user to take into an operational environment to conduct an Operational Test and Evaluation (OT&E). The company’s (SAA) system, which integrates the DRR and TCAS II capabilities, is now at TRL 6 and will mature once it meets all of the requirements being developed by Radio Technical Commission for Aeronautics (RTCA) Special Committee 228. The integrated SAA system will continue to fly aboard
NASA’s Ikhana (Predator B) this year in support of a series of NASA flight tests that will measure the performance of the entire system in multiple situations.

RTCA SC-228, Minimum Operational Performance Standards for Unmanned Aircraft Systems, established May 20, 2013, is working to develop the Minimum Operational Performance Standards (MOPS) for DAA equipment and a Command and Control (C2) Data Link MOPS establishing L-Band and C-Band solutions.  The initial phase of standards development will focus on civil UAS equipped to operate into Class A airspace under IFR flight rules. The Operational Environment for the MOPS is the transitioning of a UAS to and from Class A or special use airspace, traversing Class D and E, and perhaps Class G airspace.  A second phase of MOPS development is envisaged to specify DAA equipment to support extended UAS operations in Class D, E, and perhaps G, airspace. The committee delivered two White Papers is December 2013 – Detect and Avoid (DAA) White Paper and Command and Control (C2) Data Link White Paper.  Phase I preliminary MOPS for DAA and C2 are expected in July 2015 with final MOPS planned for July 2016.

NASA, FAA, Industry Conduct Initial Sense-and-Avoid Test | NASA
Objectives of this effort included evaluation of the performance of ACAS Xu collision avoidance algorithms against air traffic using both legacy Traffic Collision Avoidance System (TCAS II) messages and proof of concept Automatic Dependent Surveillance-Broadcast (ADS-B) messages. For these tests, air traffic designated as a non-cooperative intruder was tracked using an air-to-air radar system developed by GA-ASI. ACAS Xu is the first collision avoidance function designed explicitly for UAS. It can be matched to aircraft performance and is designed to be fully interoperable with future ACAS X variants as well as with legacy systems such as the TCAS II currently used on most commercial transport aircraft.
Researchers evaluated three self-separation displays and algorithms and their ability to effectively inform the UAS pilot of nearby traffic and help resolve conflicts in a timely manner. These flight tests also validated airborne radar and ADS-B surveillance simulation models on sensor performance and uncertainties to help determine the effects of these parameters and environmental conditions on self-separation algorithm’s performance. Flight-testing of collision-avoidance and self-separation technology contributes to ongoing work to develop a technical standard for a sense/detect-and-avoid system for UAS.
For more about NASA Armstrong Flight Research Center, visit:

Previously:

    Wednesday, February 11, 2015

    Services Rate Key defense suppliers

    Key defense suppliers recognized for stellar delivery to warfighters | Article | The United States Army

    Army

    • Tier I business segments (Best):
      • - BAE Electronic
      • - BAE Global Combat Systems
      • - Boeing Global Services & Support
      • - Finmeccanica DRS Technologies
      • - General Electric Aviation
      • - Harris Corporation
      • - Lockheed Martin Info. Systems & Global Solutions
      • - Lockheed Martin Missiles & Fire Control
      • - Lockheed Martin Mission Systems & Training
      • - Science Application International Corporation -- Research and Development
      • - SRC Tech Inc.
    • Tier 2 business segments:
      • - Aerovironment Inc.
      • - Boeing Military Aircraft
      • - Booz Allen Hamilton Inc.
      • - Chemring Group PLC
      • - Cubic Inc.
      • - General Dynamics Info. Systems and Technology
      • - Northrop Grumman Aerospace Systems
      • - Northrop Grumman Electronic Systems
      • - Northrop Grumman Information Systems
      • - Raytheon Integrated Defense Systems
      • - Raytheon Space and Airborne Systems
      • - Science Application International Corporation -- Government Services
      • - Thales-Raytheon Systems
    • Tier 3 business segments:
      • - Alliant Techsystems Defense Group
      • - BAE Systems Land & Armaments
      • - Boeing Network & Space Systems
      • - CSC North American Public Sector
      • - General Atomics Technology - Aeronautical Systems
      • - General Dynamics Combat Systems
      • - Honeywell International Aerospace
      • - Oshkosh Corporation
      • - Raytheon Intelligence, Information and Services
      • - Raytheon Missile Systems
      • - Textron Bell Helicopter
      • - Textron Systems
      • - United Technologies -- Sikorsky
      • - United Technologies Aerospace Systems

    Air Force

    • Tier 1 business segments (Best):
      • - Boeing Commercial Aircraft
      • - General Dynamics Aerospace
      • - L-3 Communications Systems
      • - Lockheed Martin Aeronautics2
      • - Lockheed Martin Information Systems & Global Solutions
      • - Lockheed Martin Mission Systems & Training
      • - Lockheed Martin Space
      • - BAE Systems Electronic Systems
      • - Northrop Grumman Information Systems
      • - Rockwell Collins Commercial Systems
      • - Rolls Royce
      • - Sierra Nevada Corp
      • - United Technologies Pratt & Whitney
    • Tier 2 business segments:
      • - Boeing Military Aircraft
      • - Boeing Global Services & Support
      • - Boeing Network & Space Systems
      • - GE Aviation
      • - Honeywell International Aerospace
      • - L-3 Aerospace Systems
      • - L-3 National Security Solutions
      • - Lockheed Martin Missiles & Fire Control
      • - Northrop Grumman Aerospace Systems
      • - Northrop Grumman Electronic Systems
      • - Raytheon Integrated Defense Systems
      • - Raytheon Space and Airborne Systems
      • - Textron Aviation
      • - United Technologies UTC Aerospace Systems
    • Tier 3 business segments:
      • - BAE Systems Intelligence & Security
      • - Exelis C4ISR Electronics and Systems
      • - Exelis Information & Technical Services
      • - General Atomics Technology Corp Aeronautical Systems
      • - General Dynamics Information Systems and Technology
      • - Jacobs Engineering Tybrin
      • - L-3 Electronic Systems
      • - Leidos Corp (formerly SAIC)
      • - Northrop Grumman Technical Services
      • - Raytheon Intelligence, Information and Services
      • - Raytheon Missile Systems
      • - Rockwell Collins Government Systems
      • - Textron Systems
      • - ULA/ULS
      • - United Technologies Sikorsky  

    Department of the Navy Names Superior Suppliers for 2014
    The program assessed three years' worth of performance data through the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS). The top 30 corporations based on contract obligations during the assessed period were evaluated at the company, operating division or business unit level resulting in the evaluation of 80 suppliers. The top 30 of these 80 suppliers, based on contract obligations, were then further evaluated for merit and ranked using CPARS data. In addition to the nine top tier superior suppliers [in the first tier] noted above, the remaining suppliers were grouped into the following two tiers listed below in alphabetical order: 

    Navy

    • First Tier (Best)
      • General Dynamics Combat Systems
      • General Dynamics Marine Systems
      • General Electric Aviation
      • Lockheed Martin Mission Systems and Training
      • MHSCo Sikorsky Lockheed Martin Partnership
      • Northrop Grumman Aerospace Systems
      • Raytheon Integrated Defense Systems
      • Raytheon Intelligence, Information and Services
      • Rolls-Royce Defence Aerospace
    • Second Tier
      • BAE Electronic Systems
      • BAE Systems Land and Armaments
      • Bell Helicopter
      • Boeing Military Aircraft
      • General Dynamics Information Systems and Technology Ingalls Shipbuilding ITT Exelis
      • L-3 Communication Electronic Systems
      • Northrop Grumman Electronic Systems
      • Raytheon Missile Systems
      • Raytheon Space and Airborne Systems
      • Rockwell Collins Simulation
    • Third Tier
      • ATK Defense
      • Austal USA
      • Bell Boeing Joint Project Office
      • Lockheed Martin Aeronautics
      • Lockheed Martin Space Systems
      • Navistar Defense
      • Newport News Shipbuilding
      • Sikorsky
      • UTC Propulsion and Aerospace Systems