Hearings| Homeland Security & Governmental Affairs Committee
GAO Evaluates new Clearance Procedures
A regulation jointly proposed by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence and the Office of Personnel Management to update the position designation process is inadequate, said a Government Accountability Office official. The proposed regulation is "a good step" toward meeting GAOs recommendations for updating security clearance issuance at agencies,
said Brenda Farrell, director of defense capabilities and management at GAO. However, implementation guidance still needs to be developed. Farrell spoke during a Nov. 20 hearing before the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs subcommittee on efficiency and effectiveness of federal programs and the federal workforce.
What GAO Found
In July 2012, GAO reported that the Director
of National Intelligence (DNI), as Security Executive Agent, had not
provided executive branch agencies clearly defined policy and procedures
to consistently determine if a position requires a personnel security
clearance. Absent this guidance, agencies are using an Office of
Personnel Management (OPM) position designation tool to determine the
sensitivity and risk levels of civilian positions which, in turn, inform
the type of investigation needed. OPM audits, however, found
inconsistency in these position designations, and some agencies
described problems implementing OPM's tool. For example, in an April
2012 audit OPM assessed the sensitivity levels of 39 positions, and its
designations differed from the agency in 26 positions. Problems exist,
in part, because OPM and the Office of the Director of National
Intelligence (ODNI) did not collaborate on the development of this tool,
and because their respective roles for suitability and security
clearance reform are still evolving. As a result, to help determine the
proper designation, GAO recommended that the DNI, in coordination with
the Director of OPM, issue clearly defined policy and procedures for
federal agencies to follow when determining if federal civilian
positions require a security clearance. The DNI concurred with this
recommendation. In May 2013, the DNI and OPM jointly drafted a proposed
revision to the federal regulation on position designation which, if
finalized in its current form, would provide additional requirements and
examples of position duties at each sensitivity level. GAO also
recommended that once those policies and procedures are in place, the
DNI and the Director of OPM, in their roles as Executive Agents,
collaborate to revise the position designation tool to reflect the new
guidance. ODNI and OPM concurred with this recommendation and recently
told GAO that they are revising the tool.
Why GAO Did This Study
Personnel security clearances allow individuals access to classified information that, through unauthorized disclosure, can in some cases cause exceptionally grave damage to U.S. national security. A sound requirements process to determine whether a national security position requires access to classified information is needed to safeguard classified data and manage costs. The DNI reported that more than 4.9 million federal government and contractor employees held or were eligible to hold a security clearance in 2012. GAO has reported that the federal government spent over $1 billion to conduct background investigations (in support of security clearances and suitability determinations--the consideration of character and conduct for federal employment) in fiscal year 2011.
No comments:
Post a Comment